Donald Trump & Joe Biden

[Alikado]

THERE IS NO LAW against him making the payment

It is the subsequent actions that it is alleged broke the law.

It's really quite simple. Why do you insist on being wrong?


https://www.quora.com/What-exactly-i...ting-adults-in

As to the timing, it could have been completed six months ago. It is Trump's conduct of his case that has led to it being now.

He's trying to string it out to the election and if he wins the first thing he will do is pardon himself.

It's tax that gets them in the end.

[bensherman]

And now Federal judge Cannon in Florida has indefinitely postponed the documents trial.
For no good reason. The DOJ had already not contested two delays.
She is in danger of being removed from the case.
It would appear she is hoping Trump gets elected and he rewards her .
Now THAT is corrupt!

[local]

More comedy gold from the forum thickwit Rodney;



Here you are underline what is wrong,




I am not sure why I am bothering but Trumps payment to Stormy Daniels would normally be considered a "misdemeanour" but has been "Trumped Up" by a corrupt system to a felony charge 8 years after the payment and 18 years after the alleged encounter at a golf tournament.

The prosecution alleges it was done to change the course of the election.

The problem I have is with a legal system that allows such a thing to happen clearly at a time to disrupt the political process.

It is this charade that empowers Trump who as I have been saying for years should be boring people on a golf course.

The emetic as I christened him before he stood is clearly bringing up some bile.


Shall I get a biscuit

So I asked and got this from our forum thickwit


THERE IS NO LAW against him making the payment

Have you not understood the prosecutions case Rodney?*

It is the subsequent actions that it is alleged broke the law.

It's really quite simple. Why do you insist on being wrong?


https://www.quora.com/What-exactly-i...ting-adults-in

As to the timing, it could have been completed six months ago. It is Trump's conduct of his case that has led to it being now.



Wasted my biscuit

Dust off another Rodney


*https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ing-statements


Critically for this case, he said that Mr Trump was motivated to provide the payoff so voters did not learn of the alleged encounter with Ms Daniels.

Prosecutors said that this cover-up should be considered election interference, which constituted a second crime. That elevated the charge of falsifying business records from a lower-level misdemeanour into a more serious felony.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-68877610

[bensherman]

This matter has been in the works for over four years.

The delay this year is down to Trump and his mediocre lawyers.

There is nothing "trumped up".

As for "corrupt" where do you begin? Try taking a look at Judge Cannon in Florida. Now THAT's corrupt!

[local]

Trumps Corrupt Prosecutor and his unbelievable path to trial.

It defies belief that this man is anywhere near the trial of a former President.



It is further proof if ever any was needed of the people behind this ludicrous "Trumped" up prosecution.


Any decent person would have stood aside.







https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...iels-case.html

And before the inevitable Daily Fail comments look at their previous comments on Trump.

[silver fox]

Trumps Corrupt Prosecutor and his unbelievable path to trial.

It defies belief that this man is anywhere near the trial of a former President.



It is further proof if ever any was needed of the people behind this ludicrous "Trumped" up prosecution.


Any decent person would have stood aside.







https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...iels-case.html

And before the inevitable Daily Fail comments look at their previous comments on Trump.

I hope when you refer to a decent person standing aside, you mean the orange balloon in a blue suit, Trump.

[local]

I hope when you refer to a decent person standing aside, you mean the orange balloon in a blue suit, Trump.

I am sure Trump would gladly have stood to one side if he could.

But a quick run throiugh the prosecutors CV highlights the problems that the average Joe or Joanna sees in the case, so it enriches and propels Trump towards the Whitehouse, which,



HE DOES NOT DESERVE

Which I have said many times and seems to be ignored


Follow the link for those who do not or due to TDS want to see the problems.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...iels-case.html